RAPID decision making framework: roles, steps & tips

It's normal to feel nervous when you have to make a big decision at work. After all, you never quite know how things will turn out. Luckily, data-driven decision-making frameworks can help lessen those nerves by clearly assigning roles and responsibilities for each decision.

Enter RAPID decision-making, a framework that helps you assign team members to specific roles. RAPID is particularly helpful for making large decisions involving many stakeholders, because each stakeholder knows what type of feedback they're expected to provide. RAPID is an acronym for five roles, each of which is responsible for different aspects of the decision-making process.

What is the RAPID decision-making model?

RAPID is a decision-making framework developed by Bain & Company that assigns clear roles to stakeholders involved in complex decisions. The acronym stands for five distinct roles:

• Recommend

• Agree

• Perform

• Input

• Decide

Keep in mind that the order of the acronym doesn't usually match the order of your decision-making process. For example, you'll want to gather input (I) first for most decisions, even though it's fourth on the list. On smaller teams, the same person might hold more than one role, while larger organizations might have a full tiger team for one role.

When to use RAPID

Despite its name, the RAPID framework isn't about speed. It's designed to help you make key decisions thoughtfully and accurately by clarifying what type of feedback each stakeholder can (and can't) give. That said, RAPID decisions often take less time than a disorganized process because roles are clear from the start.

RAPID is a thoughtful and constructive process, but it's not meant for every problem. The process naturally lends itself to more complex issues that require substantial stakeholder input.

In general, you won't need RAPID for:

• Simple problems.

• Time-sensitive decisions.

• Decisions that can be made by one person.

RAPID decision-making vs. RACI charts

Both RAPID and RACI help you determine roles, but they serve different purposes. Here's how they compare:

For example, a RACI chart might determine that an engineer is responsible for product development. A RAPID framework could then temporarily assign that same engineer to a hiring committee decision.

The 5 roles in RAPID decision-making

RAPID roles are assigned to a single person or group of people who handle an organization's decision-making. One person can have multiple roles, or multiple people can be in one role. RAPID is meant to be flexible while also providing a structure that prioritizes good decision-making.

This structure is built around the five roles of RAPID:

1. Recommend (R)

The recommender drives the process forward, similar to a team lead. They're responsible for building the proposal and coordinating input from other roles. This role can be filled by an individual or a task force.

If you're deciding whether to update your software, the recommender creates the proposal and gathers relevant information from other stakeholders.

2. Agree (A)

The agreer holds significant authority in the process. Unlike other stakeholders, you must consider their input in the final decision. You don't need an agree role for every decision, just the more specialized ones.

A software developer in the agree role might specify the exact code needed for an error-free feature. Their input is non-negotiableif you want to avoid bugs.

3. Perform (P)

The performer's role is responsible for implementing whatever decision is made. This is the last step of the decision-making process, but you should still assign it in advance. By getting the performer lined up before they're needed, you can move more quickly from ideation to implementation.

The performer would likely be the software developer who actually creates your new software. Or it might be the project manager responsible for a development team.

4. Input (I)

While it's further down in the acronym, the input role is normally the first one you assign. Their responsibility is to provide information and advice throughout the decision-making process. Unlike the agreer, they don't have final say; they're presenting information, not approving decisions.

Input typically comes from:

• Subject matter experts

• Key stakeholders

• People who will be impacted by the decision

A project manager might perform a cost-benefit analysis, while a software developer provides technical information about what would go into creating new software.

5. Decide (D)

The decide role is the person who makes the final decision. They should understand all sides of the story, any trade-offs, and the impacts that the decision will have on everyone involved. The decider must consider the information and opinions of the agreer, though they don't necessarily need to share their opinion.

Example: The decision maker would likely be from a different team (not software), so they could review all relevant data objectively. Note that the decider does not need to be in leadership; assigning someone who's not a team lead can reduce bias in your decision-making.

No more silos: Optimizing your organizational structure for stronger cross-team collaboration

In this ebook, learn how to structure your organization to prevent silos, move faster, and stay aligned in the face of change.

Get the insights

How to implement RAPID in your organization

Once you understand the five RAPID roles, you're ready to put the framework into practice. Here's how to get started:

1. Identify high-stakes decisions. Start by selecting decisions that involve multiple stakeholders or have a significant organizational impact. These are the scenarios where RAPID adds the most value.

2. Assign roles based on expertise, not hierarchy. Choose people for each RAPID role based on their knowledge and proximity to the decision, not their title. This helps reduce bias and brings in the right perspectives.

3. Document your RAPID assignments. Create a simple decision matrix or use a project management tool to track who holds each role. This creates transparency and makes accountability clear from the start.

4. Communicate roles to all stakeholders. Make sure everyone involved understands their role and what's expected of them. Clear communication prevents confusion and sets the stage for a smoother process.

5. Review and iterate. After each decision, reflect on what worked and what didn't. Adjust your approach for future decisions to make the process even more effective over time.

By following these steps, you can introduce RAPID in a way that feels manageable and builds momentum as your team gains confidence with the framework.

Example of RAPID in action

Let's say you're on the team responsible for product pricing. This is a high-stakes decision that affects revenue, growth, and customer retention. RAPID helps you bring together the right people to find the sweet spot.

Here's how you might assign the roles:

• Recommend: Product manager who builds the pricing proposal

• Input: Sales, finance, and customer success teams who share market data

• Agree: Legal or compliance lead who must approve pricing terms

• Decide: VP of Product who makes the final call

• Perform: Marketing team that implements pricing across channels

Without RAPID, you might end up with an arbitrary price that doesn't maximize profits, or worse, scares away potential customers.

Benefits of using RAPID

RAPID involves a variety of stakeholders in critical group decisions. Instead of relying solely on the board or CEO, anyone at any level can have a say. Here's what else the framework helps you do:

• Involve more people in decisions that directly affect them. This is a more empowering way to lead than making decisions without your team's input.

• Increase transparency in the decision-making process. If you disagree, you know who to talk to and how to make changes.

• Distribute power in an organization so it's not always those at the top who make decisions.

• Include different perspectives to identify opportunities and challenges. The more inclusive your RAPID is, the more perspectives (and ultimately, solutions) you're exposed to.

• Empower everyone in the organization to make decisions, helping them feel greater ownership of their work, roles, and the organization as a whole.

• Create accountability for decisions across teams and individuals so everyone feels how their actions affect company decisions.

What to watch out for

RAPID decision-making is a useful, powerful tool, but it can be challenging to apply. Like any large-scale change, using RAPID for the first time might prompt some pushback. Knowing and planning for these potential challenges in advance can help make the transition easier.

Here's what to watch out for:

• Power dynamics. RAPID highlights that some people may have more power than others, which can lead to conflicts. If conflicts arise when you're implementing RAPID, try practicing conflict resolution strategies that get to the root of the issues.

• Comfortable control. The decider role can be a fun one to hold, and some people are reluctant to give up that control. In RAPID, it makes more sense to hand decision-making off to those who might not normally have it to get less biased results.

• Too much reliance on leadership. It's easy to fall back on leaders to make decisions. RAPID encourages you to rotate the person in the decision-making role so it's not always a C-suite executive or a member of the board of directors.

Make better decisions with RAPID and Asana

When you want to decide which shirt to wear, you're better off closing your eyes and pointing. But when you're deciding those big-picture questions that will have a long-lasting impact on your business, RAPID can help you make a better, higher-quality decision than you might on your own.

Complex decision-making relies on complex thinking, but organizing those thoughts, data, and inputs should be simple. With Asana, you can collaborate on every high-impact decision, assign RAPID roles, and track the progress as your decisions move through the process. Get started today to bring clarity to your team's most important decisions.

No more silos: Optimizing your organizational structure for stronger cross-team collaboration

In this ebook, learn how to structure your organization to prevent silos, move faster, and stay aligned in the face of change.

Get the insights

Frequently asked questions about RAPID decision-making